Proposal to Santa Paula City Council

Here is the text of the proposal that was blocked tonight by the city attorney.

Santa Paula Water LLC, PERC Water, and PERC Solar are interested in negotiating with the City of Santa Paula in order to accomplish the following objectives:

§         Provide liquidity to the City

§         Identify new revenue sources for the City

§         Reduce costs for the City without impacting City jobs

Santa Paula Water LLC, PERC Water, and PERC Solar propose the following:

1. Make available up to $2.5 million in cash for the City to use in the general fund. This money would come from the purchase of the City’s hard assets, i.e, property, buildings, infrastructure, and vehicles.  The purchase would include provisions for the city to lease back the purchased assets.  The city would also repurchase the assets by a specified date.  The amount of the lease payment and the repurchase price would be negotiated and based on available cash-flows within the City.

2. PERC Solar would like to negotiate a 20-year lease of the property next to the water recycling facility currently under a ground lease with Santa Paula Water.  PERC Solar would build and operate a solar electric generation facility.  The electricity produced by the facility would be purchased by the City for use in the wastewater treatment facility.  The lease payments would be accelerated and paid “up front”.  Depending on the nature of the agreement the accelerated lease payment could be as much as $500,000.  At the end of 20 years, the City would own the solar generation facility.

3. PERC Water will review the operating and maintenance costs of the City’s sewer collection system to identify cost savings and efficiencies for the City, including the possible purchase of the City’s vactor truck.  Santa Paula Water would also review the existing collection system for a potential concession agreement that could include an upfront concession payment.

4. PERC Water would partner with the City to develop customers and infrastructure to allow for the sale of reclaimed water generated by the water recycling facility.  The City and PERC Water would share in the income and profit.

5. Santa Paula Water understands that the City of Santa Paula has a problem with excessive amounts of chlorides present in the water.  It is currently not clear when and how the chlorides are being introduced into the water.  Although, Santa Paula Water and PERC Water recognize that the City of Santa Paula is responsible for resolving the problem, they propose to help the city with this issue in the following way:

1. First: Santa Paula Water could fund a study to determine the source and cause of the high levels of chlorides currently found in the water that is entering into the City’s wastewater collection system.

2. Second: Santa Paula Water and PERC Water would work with the city to develop a program so the City can offer to exchange resident’s old water softener systems with new modern systems.  Note: This exchange/maintenance program has the potential to become a monthly revenue source for the city.

3. Third. Santa Paula Water and PERC Water would work with the City to implement a program of reducing chloride levels at the source of water supply, thereby providing better quality water to residents and reducing the overall level of chlorides in the water supply.

6. Santa Paula Water has the opportunity to purchase and bank large quantities of fresh water at extremely discounted rates.  They would like to work with the city to take advantage of the lower cost of water. This is a short-term opportunity that would allow the city to realize a financial benefit.

7. PERC Solar would work with the city to develop a program to install solar generation on the rooftops of city-owned buildings.  This would provide revenue for the City.

8. Santa Paula Water and PERC Water would work with the City to ease the stress of payment for the outstanding change orders on the water recycling facility by financing such change orders over time..

Santa Paula Water LLC, PERC Water, and PERC Solar may also consider ways they could assist Santa Paula to finance the construction of:

9. A police firearms training and practice facility.  Such a facility’s services would be made available to other agencies in the area and would generate revenue for the City.

10. An animal shelter/holding facility.  Such a facility’s services would be made available to other cities in the area and would generate revenue for the City.

Llama-nomics 101

An interesting story about the investment lesson learned by one man's desire to become a llama tycoon. Let's follow my hypothetical friend, Fred, as he pursues his lifelong dream of having a large llama ranch and find out what he learns about investing in the constantly changing llama market.

It all starts one cool, gray, November morning when Fred decided to start a llama ranch. His plan? Spend $100 each month buying as many llamas as he can until he gets a large herd. This month llamas cost $50 each. Fred has $100 to spend, so he buys 2. He is on his way, the first steps toward the wealth and freedom that only a herd of llamas can provide.

It's December now, time to buy more animals. The llama market is just booming and prices have gone up. It seems that everyone wants to buy llamas. They cost $100 each now. Not to be deterred from his quest, Fred buys one more to add to his herd.

January rolls around and llama prices are still at $100 each, and the news media is buzzing about the exciting and wonderful llama market boom we are having. No matter where you go, people are talking about the exciting growth in the llama market. Television commercials play every few minutes with some guy proclaiming, "I expect llama prices to go to $200 in the next few months!" Other wiser and more even-tempered llama analysts warn that the current market is overpriced and the llama "bubble" will burst soon. "Llama prices will fall dramatically", they say. In fact, some even predict that the llama market could collapse completely.

Fred just smiles, and staying true to his original plan, he purchases one more in January.

But then February brings bad news for the llama market. Apparently somebody mixed some risky armadillo futures with some unstable alpaca loans and sold them to investors on the llama market. In a "crash" that happens almost overnight, the price for llamas has plummets to a mere $5 each.

Everybody's herd is now worth 1/20th of what it was in December and January. Now, most llama ranchers would be jumping out of windows at this point, but Fred is undaunted and remains focused on his goal of becoming a llama mogul. He takes the $100 he budgeted and buys several more.

In March, the price has recovered a little bit, but the llama market is still looking bad. Llamas are only selling for $10 each. "Onward!" Fred declares, and he spends another $100.

April rolls around and the llama market has improved a little more. Llama prices have risen to $20 each, so Fred buys some more to add to his growing herd.

Now it's May. Fred has had enough. Those llamas are tearing up the place and they are really smelly, so he decides to RETIRE and sell the whole heard. The problem is that the llama market still hasn't returned to those glorious "Boom Market" prices of last November, December and January. Right now Fred can only sell his animals for $25 apiece. Remembering those glorious days of $100 llama prices, Fred sighs. "Oh well," he thinks. "You can't win them all." So off they go to be sold.

Then Fred gets his check from selling the llamas. Wait a minute! "I made a profit?" Fred exclaims. How'd that happen? Let's take a closer look:

Over a six-month period Fred spent $100 each month purchasing llamas for a total cash outlay of $600.

Fred purchased llamas at various prices.

In May, Fred sold his 39 animals at $25 each for a total of $975. Subtract the original $600 investment, and Fred walks away with a tidy profit of $375.

Congratulations! Fred has discovered the power of "Time and Consistency" coupled with the principle of "Llama Cost Averaging". (Dollar Cost Averaging)

Legal disclaimer: No llamas were hurt or injured in writing this story. This article is for educational purposes only and is not a solicitation to buy, sell, or transact any type of investment, (llama or otherwise).

When Does $35,000 Equal $190,000?

Here is an illustration of the high cost of waiting to start a simple saving program.

Bob is 21 years old and he decides to begin saving for his retirement.  He starts putting $5000 each year into some type of  account, (a IRA, for example).  He does that for 7 years until he turns 28 and then he decides to quit and spend his money on other things.  He lets the money in his account sit and earn interest until he retires at age 65.

Fred, who is also 21 years old, decides that he will start saving later.  He spends all his money and doesn't have any left over to put in savings.  Then, when he turns 28, Fred decides he had better start putting money away for his retirement. He begins to put $5000 a year away just like Bob did, only Fred faithfully puts $5000 in every year starting at age 28 until he turns 65.

At age 65, which one has the most money? 

Remember they are both using the same type of savings program and they both realize the same rate of return.  Since Fred has put a total $190,000 in his account, compared to Bob's $35,000, it would be reasonable to assume that Fred will have more money. 

In truth Bob will have more money than Fred when they reach age 65.

Because Bob started earlier, his money has had more time to "compound", (doubling periods).  Using an example rate of 10%, Bob's $35,000 will grow to $1,944,326 by the time he is 65.  Meanwhile, Fred's $190,000 will have only grown to $1,820,217.  That is a difference of over $100,000 !

This simple illustration underscores the importance of time and consistency when saving money for future needs.

Disclaimer:  The above is for illustrative purposes only and is not representative of any specific type of investment, and is not a solicitation to conduct any type of business or investment transaction.